Author
Listed:
- Dennis Aldenhoff
- Björn-Martin Kurzrock
Abstract
Limited economic feasibility due to high investment costs and relatively small energy cost savings is seen as a major reason for low refurbishment rates of the building stock in many countries. Improving economic feasibility can therefore be essential to grow refurbishment rates. Carbon tax or funding grants are possible ways to achieve this. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of energy-efficient modernization depends on the necessity for refurbishment. If refurbishment measures are necessary, additional energy-efficient modernization can be carried out at comparatively low cost. Accordingly, modernizations are strongly dependent on the refurbishment cycle of the building. In order to achieve the intended climate targets for the building sector, it is therefore necessary to use refurbishment options for energy-efficient modernization as well. In addition, it must be taken into account that the younger the building is, the lower the potential for energy savings and thus the economic sense due to lower energy cost savings. The most challenging modernizations are all yet to come. As the refurbishment cycle is essential, the question arises as to how high the theoretical refurbishment rate is, how high it is effectively, and how high it must be to achieve the climate targets for the residential building stock. This paper aims to model the basis for the target-oriented transformation of the residential building stock, so that scenarios in line with climate goals for the residential building stock can be simulated depending on the necessary economic incentives. Using current statistics and the past development of the German residential building stock, central parameters like living space, new construction, deconstruction and the modernization rate are modeled endogenously. The modernization rate represents a full modernization and thus allows an easy connection of the model with energetic parameters for building classes defined in the European web database TABULA. The results are of relevance for modelling the building stock and deriving suitable modernization measures also in other countries.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:2022_137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.