IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.08798.html

Recursive Copula Aggregation for Market and Credit Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Luisa Tibiletti
  • Simone Farinelli
  • Eric Dal Moro

Abstract

Risk aggregation is a central problem in financial risk management and regulatory capital assessment. While copula-based approaches are widely used due to their tractability and interpretability, standard implementations rely on flat dependence structures that may fail to capture hierarchical interactions across risk components. This paper introduces a hierarchical copula framework for risk aggregation on trees, in which dependence is specified locally at each aggregation node and propagated through recursive rank-based reordering. The approach preserves marginal distributions while enabling flexible and economically interpretable modeling of dependence across multiple aggregation levels. Copula parameters are calibrated from empirical data using Kendalls tau, and the methodology is illustrated using market and credit risk proxies. Robustness is assessed across alternative credit segments, including investment-grade and high-yield indices. Numerical results show that dependence strength increases under stress and varies systematically across credit quality, with important implications for risk measurement. The proposed framework combines the transparency of copula-based aggregation with the structural richness of hierarchical models, providing a practical and scalable tool for enterprise risk management. This contributes to bridging bottom-up and top-down approaches to risk aggregation. Keywords: hierarchical copulae; dependence modelling; Kendalls tau calibration; Gaussian and Clayton copulae; tail dependence; risk aggregation. Key Messages: - Recursive hierarchical copulas aggregate market and credit portfolios. - Empirical dependence calibration is combined with sample reordering. - The framework computes VaR and Expected Shortfall transparently. - Tail dependence significantly affects hierarchical risk aggregation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Tibiletti & Simone Farinelli & Eric Dal Moro, 2026. "Recursive Copula Aggregation for Market and Credit Portfolios," Papers 2610.08798, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.08798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08798
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Salvatore D. Tomarchio & Michael P. B. Gallaugher, 2026. "Mixtures of regressions using matrix-variate heavy-tailed distributions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 20(1), pages 11-38, March.
    3. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    4. Masahiko Egami & Rusudan Kevkhishvili, 2020. "Time reversal and last passage time of diffusions with applications to credit risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 795-825, July.
    5. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    6. Pfeifer Dietmar & Mändle Andreas & Ragulina Olena, 2017. "New copulas based on general partitions-of-unity and their applications to risk management (part II)," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 246-255, October.
    7. Diba Daraei & Kristina Sendova, 2024. "Determining Safe Withdrawal Rates for Post-Retirement via a Ruin-Theory Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    9. Nevrla, Matěj, 2020. "Systemic risk in European financial and energy sectors: Dynamic factor copula approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    10. Dima, Bogdan & Dima, Ştefana Maria & Ioan, Roxana, 2025. "The short-run impact of investor expectations’ past volatility on current predictions: The case of VIX," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Eric Vansteenberhge, 2025. "Insurance Supervision under Climate Change: A Pioneer Detection Method," Papers 2511.16760, arXiv.org.
    12. Chen, Yiqing, 2025. "The heavy-tail behavior of the difference of two dependent random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Ruodu Wang & Jingcheng Yu, 2026. "E-Backtesting Expected Shortfall without Value-at-Risk Forecasts under Time-series Models," Papers 2610.17681, arXiv.org.
    14. Battulga Gankhuu, 2022. "Merton's Default Risk Model for Private Company," Papers 2208.01974, arXiv.org.
    15. Saminger-Platz Susanne & Kolesárová Anna & Šeliga Adam & Mesiar Radko & Klement Erich Peter, 2024. "On comprehensive families of copulas involving the three basic copulas and transformations thereof," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-36.
    16. Conlon, Thomas & Cotter, John & Ropotos, Ioannis, 2026. "Drivers of firm-level tail dependence: A machine learning approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Jose Blanchet & Henry Lam & Yang Liu & Ruodu Wang, 2025. "Convolution Bounds on Quantile Aggregation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2761-2781, September.
    18. Hengxin Cui & Ken Seng Tan & Fan Yang, 2024. "Portfolio credit risk with Archimedean copulas: asymptotic analysis and efficient simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 55-84, January.
    19. Stephan Schlüter & Fabian Menz & Milena Kojić & Petar Mitić & Aida Hanić, 2022. "A Novel Approach to Generate Hourly Photovoltaic Power Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Borowska, Agnieszka & Hoogerheide, Lennart & Koopman, Siem Jan & van Dijk, Herman K., 2020. "Partially censored posterior for robust and efficient risk evaluation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 335-355.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.08798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.