IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.25641.html

The Econometrics of Utility Transferability in Dyadic Network Formation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Marshall

Abstract

This paper studies how to estimate an individual's taste for forming a connection with another individual in a network. It compares the difficulty of estimation with and without the assumption that utility is transferable between individuals, and with and without the assumption that regressors are symmetric across individuals in the pair. I show that when pair-specific regressors are symmetric, the sufficient conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator that assumes transferable utility (TU-MLE) are also sufficient for the maximum likelihood estimator that does not assume transferable utility (NTU-MLE). When regressors are asymmetric, I provide sufficient conditions for the consistency and asymptotic normality of the NTU-MLE. I also provide a specification test to assess the validity of the transferable utility assumption. Two applications from different fields of economics demonstrate the value of my results. I find evidence of researchers using the TU-MLE when the transferable utility assumption is violated, and evidence of researchers using NTU-model-based estimators when the validity of the transferable utility assumption cannot be rejected.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Marshall, 2026. "The Econometrics of Utility Transferability in Dyadic Network Formation Models," Papers 2603.25641, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.25641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.25641
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuyang Sheng, 2020. "A Structural Econometric Analysis of Network Formation Games Through Subnetworks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(5), pages 1829-1858, September.
    2. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An Econometric Model of Network Formation With Degree Heterogeneity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1033-1063, July.
    3. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Andreas Dzemski, 2019. "An Empirical Model of Dyadic Link Formation in a Network with Unobserved Heterogeneity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(5), pages 763-776, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Li & Zhentao Shi & Yapeng Zheng, 2024. "Bagging the Network," Papers 2410.23852, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    2. Candelaria, Luis E. & Ura, Takuya, 2023. "Identification and inference of network formation games with misclassified links," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 862-891.
    3. L. Sanna Stephan, 2024. "Semiparametric Estimation of Individual Coefficients in a Dyadic Link Formation Model Lacking Observable Characteristics," Papers 2408.04552, arXiv.org.
    4. Vincent Starck, 2025. "Improving control over unobservables with network data," Papers 2511.00612, arXiv.org.
    5. Shaomin Wu, 2024. "Two-step Estimation of Network Formation Models with Unobserved Heterogeneities and Strategic Interactions," Papers 2404.12581, arXiv.org.
    6. Claudia Pigini & Alessandro Pionati & Francesco Valentini, 2025. "Grouped fixed effects regularization for binary choice models," Papers 2502.06446, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    7. Qiuping Wang & Yuan Zhang & Ting Yan, 2023. "Asymptotic theory in network models with covariates and a growing number of node parameters," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(2), pages 369-392, April.
    8. Bryan S. Graham & Andrin Pelican, 2023. "Scenario sampling for large supermodular games," CeMMAP working papers 15/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    9. St'ephane Bonhomme & Kevin Dano, 2023. "Functional Differencing in Networks," Papers 2307.11484, arXiv.org.
    10. Alex Centeno, 2022. "A Structural Model for Detecting Communities in Networks," Papers 2209.08380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    11. Gao, Wayne Yuan & Li, Ming & Xu, Sheng, 2023. "Logical differencing in dyadic network formation models with nontransferable utilities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 302-324.
    12. Aristide Houndetoungan, 2024. "Count Data Models with Heterogeneous Peer Effects under Rational Expectations," Papers 2405.17290, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    13. Alejandra Martinez & Dennis Novy & Carlo Perroni, 2025. "Transitivity in International Trade: Evidence from Colombia-U.S. Firm Relationships," Papers 2512.18893, arXiv.org.
    14. Lin, Zhongjian & Hu, Yingyao, 2024. "Binary choice with misclassification and social interactions, with an application to peer effects in attitude," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    15. Graham, Bryan S., 2020. "Network data," Handbook of Econometrics,, Elsevier.
    16. Freeman, Hugo & Weidner, Martin, 2023. "Linear panel regressions with two-way unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    17. Zuckerman, David, 2024. "Multidimensional homophily," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 486-513.
    18. Mugnier, Martin, 2025. "A simple and computationally trivial estimator for grouped fixed effects models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    19. Wenqin Du & Bailey K. Fosdick & Wen Zhou, 2025. "Regression Modeling of the Count Relational Data with Exchangeable Dependencies," Papers 2502.11255, arXiv.org.
    20. Bryan S. Graham & Andrin Pelican, 2023. "Scenario Sampling for Large Supermodular Games," Papers 2307.11857, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.25641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.