IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.03768.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Gets to Come In? How Political Engagement Shapes Views on Legal Immigration

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Hassan Bin Afzal
  • Foluke Omosun

Abstract

This study examines how political engagement shapes public attitudes toward legal immigration in the United States. Using nationally weighted data from the 2024 ANES Pilot Study, we construct a novel Political Engagement Index (PAX) based on five civic actions: discussing politics, online sharing, attending rallies, wearing political symbols, and campaign volunteering. By applying weighted ordered logistic regression models, we find that higher engagement predicts greater support for easing legal immigration, even after adjusting for education, gender, age, partisanship, income, urban residence, and generalized social trust. To capture the substantive effect, we visualize predicted probabilities across levels of engagement. In full-sample models, the likelihood of supporting "a lot harder" immigration drops from 26% to 13% as engagement rises, while support for "a lot easier" increases from 10% to 21%. Subgroup analyses by partisanship show consistent directionality, with notable shifts among Republicans. Social trust and education are also consistently associated with more open attitudes, while older respondents tend to support less lenient pathways to legal immigration policies. These findings suggest that a cumulative increase in political participation is linked to support for legal immigration pathways, with varying intensity across partisan identities and socio-demographic characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Hassan Bin Afzal & Foluke Omosun, 2025. "Who Gets to Come In? How Political Engagement Shapes Views on Legal Immigration," Papers 2504.03768, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.03768
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Will Jennings & Christopher Wlezien, 2016. "The Timeline of Elections: A Comparative Perspective," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 219-233, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:5:p:863-880 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Caroline Le Pennec & Vincent Pons, 2023. "How do Campaigns Shape Vote Choice? Multicountry Evidence from 62 Elections and 56 TV Debates," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 703-767.
    3. Andrew Gelman & Jessica Hullman & Christopher Wlezien & George Elliott Morris, 2020. "Information, incentives, and goals in election forecasts," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(5), pages 863-880, September.
    4. Jennings, Will & Lewis-Beck, Michael & Wlezien, Christopher, 2020. "Election forecasting: Too far out?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 949-962.
    5. Afzal, Muhammad Hassan Bin & Omosun, Foluke, 2025. "Who Gets to Come In? How Political Engagement Shapes Views on Legal Immigration," EconStor Conference Papers 314938, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Mongrain, Philippe & Nadeau, Richard & Jérôme, Bruno, 2021. "Playing the synthesizer with Canadian data: Adding polls to a structural forecasting model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 289-301.
    7. Rami Zeedan, 2019. "The 2016 US Presidential Elections: What Went Wrong in Pre-Election Polls? Demographics Help to Explain," J, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.