IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2409.14202.html

Mining Causality: AI-Assisted Search for Instrumental Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Sukjin Han

Abstract

The instrumental variables (IVs) method is a leading empirical strategy for causal inference. Finding IVs is a heuristic and creative process, and justifying their validity---especially exclusion restrictions---is largely rhetorical. We propose using large language models (LLMs) to search for new IVs through narratives and counterfactual reasoning, similar to how a human researcher would. The stark difference, however, is that LLMs can dramatically accelerate this process and explore an extremely large search space. We introduce a discovery pipeline that searches for potentially novel and valid IVs using two-step and role-playing prompting strategies. We contend that these strategies simulate the endogenous decision-making of economic agents and social actors and ground language models in real-world scenarios, thereby masking the IV discovery task itself. We apply our method to three canonical areas in economics: returns to schooling, demand and supply, and peer effects. We then introduce an evaluation pipeline in which we conduct expert surveys and train an LLM judge on the survey data. This evaluation reveals that the IV candidates discovered by our method appear both novel and likely valid, whereas a more direct search tends to return instruments already established in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukjin Han, 2024. "Mining Causality: AI-Assisted Search for Instrumental Variables," Papers 2409.14202, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.14202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.14202
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wayne Gao & Sukjin Han & Annie Liang, 2026. "How Well Do LLMs Predict Human Behavior? A Measure of their Pretrained Knowledge," Papers 2601.12343, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.14202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.