IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2312.08141.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to measure consumer's inconsistency in sensory testing?

Author

Listed:
  • L'aszl'o Sipos
  • Kolos Csaba 'Agoston
  • P'eter Bir'o
  • S'andor Boz'oki
  • L'aszl'o Csat'o

Abstract

Standard methods, standard test conditions and the use of good sensory practices are key elements of sensory testing. However, while compliance assessment by trained and expert assessors is well developed, few information is available on testing consumer consistency. Therefore, we aim to answer the following research questions: What type of metrics can be used to characterise (in)consistent evaluation? How to rank assessors and attributes' evaluations based on (in)consistency? Who can be considered an (in)consistent assessor? What is the difference between consistent and inconsistent assessors' evaluations and use of scale? What is the impact of consistent and inconsistent assessors' evaluations on the overall liking estimate? The proposed detection of (in)consistency requires evaluations on two connected scales. We reveal how assessors and attributes can be ranked according to the level of inconsistency, as well as how inconsistent assessors can be identified. The suggested approach is illustrated by data from sensory tests of biscuits enriched with three pollens at different levels. Future consumer tests are recommended to account for possible inconsistent evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • L'aszl'o Sipos & Kolos Csaba 'Agoston & P'eter Bir'o & S'andor Boz'oki & L'aszl'o Csat'o, 2023. "How to measure consumer's inconsistency in sensory testing?," Papers 2312.08141, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.08141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.08141
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.08141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.