IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2301.12255.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of surplus sharing on the outcomes of specific investments under negotiated transfer pricing: An agent-based simulation with fuzzy Q-learning agents

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Mitsch

Abstract

This paper focuses on specific investments under negotiated transfer pricing. Reasons for transfer pricing studies are primarily to find conditions that maximize the firm's overall profit, especially in cases with bilateral trading problems with specific investments. However, the transfer pricing problem has been developed in the context where managers are fully individual rational utility maximizers. The underlying assumptions are rather heroic and, in particular, how managers process information under uncertainty, do not perfectly match with human decision-making behavior. Therefore, this paper relaxes key assumptions and studies whether cognitively bounded agents achieve the same results as fully rational utility maximizers and, in particular, whether the recommendations on managerial-compensation arrangements and bargaining infrastructures are designed to maximize headquarters' profit in such a setting. Based on an agent-based simulation with fuzzy Q-learning agents, it is shown that in case of symmetric marginal cost parameters, myopic fuzzy Q-learning agents invest only as much as in the classic hold-up problem, while non-myopic fuzzy Q-learning agents invest optimally. However, in scenarios with non-symmetric marginal cost parameters, a deviation from the previously recommended surplus sharing rules can lead to higher investment decisions and, thus, to an increase in the firm's overall profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Mitsch, 2023. "The impact of surplus sharing on the outcomes of specific investments under negotiated transfer pricing: An agent-based simulation with fuzzy Q-learning agents," Papers 2301.12255, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.12255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.12255
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossein Sabzian & Mohammad Ali Shafia & Ali Maleki & Seyeed Mostapha Seyeed Hashemi & Ali Baghaei & Hossein Gharib, 2019. "Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners," Papers 1901.08932, arXiv.org.
    2. Yasar, Alperen, 2023. "Power struggles and gender discrimination in the workplace," SocArXiv t4g83, Center for Open Science.
    3. Ngo-Hoang, Dai-Long, 2019. "A research paper of Hossein Sabzian (2019), Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners, ArXiv, 54p," AgriXiv xutyz, Center for Open Science.
    4. Friederike Wall, 2017. "Learning To Incentivize In Different Modes Of Coordination," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02n03), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Ali E. Akgün & Halit Keskin & Sumeyye Y. Kırçovalı, 2019. "Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 57-91, February.
    6. Mitja Steinbacher & Matthias Raddant & Fariba Karimi & Eva Camacho Cuena & Simone Alfarano & Giulia Iori & Thomas Lux, 2021. "Advances in the agent-based modeling of economic and social behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Stephan Leitner & Friederike Wall, 2021. "Decision-facilitating information in hidden-action setups: an agent-based approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(2), pages 323-358, April.
    8. Richard J. Arend, 2022. "Balancing the perceptions of NK modelling with critical insights," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Dehua Gao & Aliakbar Akbaritabar, 2022. "Using agent-based modeling in routine dynamics research: a quantitative and content analysis of literature," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 521-550, February.
    10. Kristian Strmenik & Friederike Wall & Christian Mitsch & Gernot Mödritscher, 2021. "Volume allocation in multi-sourcing: effects of the quantity–quality trade-off," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 753-771, June.
    11. Friederike Wall, 2023. "Modeling managerial search behavior based on Simon’s concept of satisficing," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 265-299, June.
    12. Dar'io Blanco-Fern'andez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2021. "Multi-level Adaptation of Distributed Decision-Making Agents in Complex Task Environments," Papers 2103.02345, arXiv.org.
    13. Emanuele Borgonovo & Marco Pangallo & Jan Rivkin & Leonardo Rizzo & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 52-94, March.
    14. Friederike Wall, 2021. "Modeling Managerial Search Behavior based on Simon's Concept of Satisficing," Papers 2104.14002, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    15. Friederike Wall, 2019. "Emergence of Coordination in Growing Decision-Making Organizations: The Role of Complexity, Search Strategy, and Cost of Effort," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-26, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.12255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.