IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2209.09157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

RESHAPE: Explaining Accounting Anomalies in Financial Statement Audits by enhancing SHapley Additive exPlanations

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Muller
  • Marco Schreyer
  • Timur Sattarov
  • Damian Borth

Abstract

Detecting accounting anomalies is a recurrent challenge in financial statement audits. Recently, novel methods derived from Deep-Learning (DL) have been proposed to audit the large volumes of a statement's underlying accounting records. However, due to their vast number of parameters, such models exhibit the drawback of being inherently opaque. At the same time, the concealing of a model's inner workings often hinders its real-world application. This observation holds particularly true in financial audits since auditors must reasonably explain and justify their audit decisions. Nowadays, various Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been proposed to address this challenge, e.g., SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). However, in unsupervised DL as often applied in financial audits, these methods explain the model output at the level of encoded variables. As a result, the explanations of Autoencoder Neural Networks (AENNs) are often hard to comprehend by human auditors. To mitigate this drawback, we propose (RESHAPE), which explains the model output on an aggregated attribute-level. In addition, we introduce an evaluation framework to compare the versatility of XAI methods in auditing. Our experimental results show empirical evidence that RESHAPE results in versatile explanations compared to state-of-the-art baselines. We envision such attribute-level explanations as a necessary next step in the adoption of unsupervised DL techniques in financial auditing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Muller & Marco Schreyer & Timur Sattarov & Damian Borth, 2022. "RESHAPE: Explaining Accounting Anomalies in Financial Statement Audits by enhancing SHapley Additive exPlanations," Papers 2209.09157, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.09157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.09157
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Schreyer & Timur Sattarov & Christian Schulze & Bernd Reimer & Damian Borth, 2019. "Detection of Accounting Anomalies in the Latent Space using Adversarial Autoencoder Neural Networks," Papers 1908.00734, arXiv.org.
    2. Giorgio Visani & Enrico Bagli & Federico Chesani & Alessandro Poluzzi & Davide Capuzzo, 2022. "Statistical stability indices for LIME: Obtaining reliable explanations for machine learning models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 91-101, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Jie Yeo & Wihan van der Heever & Rui Mao & Erik Cambria & Ranjan Satapathy & Gianmarco Mengaldo, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AI," Papers 2309.11960, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haipeng Liu & Jiangtao Wang & Yayuan Geng & Kunwei Li & Han Wu & Jian Chen & Xiangfei Chai & Shaolin Li & Dingchang Zheng, 2022. "Fine-Grained Assessment of COVID-19 Severity Based on Clinico-Radiological Data Using Machine Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Ahmad Faisal Hayek & Nora Azima Noordin & Khaled Hussainey, 2022. "Machine Learning and External Auditor Perception: An Analysis for UAE External Auditors Using Technology Acceptance Model," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 475-500, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.09157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.