IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2205.01216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating beneficiaries of the child tax credit: past, present, and future

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley Nunes
  • Chung Yi See
  • Lucas Woodley
  • Nicole A. Divers
  • Audrey L. Cui

Abstract

Government efforts to address child poverty commonly encompass economic assistance programs that bolster household income. The Child Tax Credit (CTC) is the most prominent example of this. Introduced by the United States Congress in 1997, the program endeavors to help working parents via income stabilization. Our work examines the extent to which the CTC has done so. Our study, which documents clear, consistent, and compelling evidence of gender inequity in benefits realization, yields four key findings. First, stringent requisite income thresholds disproportionally disadvantage single mothers, a reflection of the high concentration of this demographic in lower segments of the income distribution. Second, married parents and, to a lesser extent, single fathers, are the primary beneficiaries of the CTC program when benefits are structured as credits rather than refunds. Third, making program benefits more generous disproportionally reduces how many single mothers, relative to married parents and single fathers, can claim this benefit. Fourth and finally, increasing credit refundability can mitigate gender differences in relief eligibility, although doing so imposes externalities of its own. Our findings can inform public policy discourse surrounding the efficacy of programs like the CTC and the effectiveness of programs aimed at alleviating child poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley Nunes & Chung Yi See & Lucas Woodley & Nicole A. Divers & Audrey L. Cui, 2022. "Estimating beneficiaries of the child tax credit: past, present, and future," Papers 2205.01216, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.01216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.01216
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.01216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.