IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2012.01331.html

Motivating Careerists

Author

Listed:
  • Liqun Liu

Abstract

Motivating careerists is challenging for political organizations. Without explicit contracts, careerists often pander to public opinions or their superiors' preferences. Worse, when tasked with implementing these distorted decisions, they tend to underinvest in the necessary efforts. We analyze the motivation problem by examining how a careerist agent fulfills these roles on behalf of a principal across various information structures. Importantly, the principal can credibly commit to performance-based reward schemes to incentivize correct decisions and diligent implementation. However, such schemes are feasible only if the principal observes policy consequences while backing away from implementation details. Along the way, we characterize the principal-optimal information structure. Putting theoretical findings into practice, we explore the underlying incentive structures and their policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Liqun Liu, 2020. "Motivating Careerists," Papers 2012.01331, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.01331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.01331
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liqun Liu, 2021. "The Politics of (No) Compromise: Information Acquisition, Policy Discretion, and Reputation," Papers 2111.00522, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.01331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.