The evolvability of business and the role of antitrust
In this paper, based on theories of complex adaptive systems, I argue that the main case for antitrust policy should be extended to include the criteria of "evolvability." To date, the main case focuses on economizing, including market power as a key filter for identifying suspect cases. Both production and transaction costs are considered as part of economizing and other factors are use to consider the benefits of different industry structures. CAS analysis focuses attention on dynamics, evolution and networks. As I will show, the criteria of evolvability requires us to consider various types of direct and indirect network impacts in business that go beyond the traditional focus on production and transaction costs. These network impacts stem from the connections between transactions and relations over time and place, including how business arrangements at one time, limit or enable arrangements in the future. An assessment of the impacts, I argue, can and should be included in the rules of antitrust and in the processes of antitrust case analysis and decision making.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Ian Wilkinson "The Evolvability of Business and the Role of Antitrust" Antitrust Bulletin 51 (1) 2006, 111-141|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://arxiv.org/ |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1203.1311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.