IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1009.4142.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

About the Justification of Experience Rating: Bonus Malus System and a new Poisson Mixture Model

Author

Listed:
  • Magda Schiegl

Abstract

The claim experience of the past is a very important information to calculate the fair price of an insurance contract. In a lot of European countries for instance the prices for motor car insurance depend on the number of claims the driver has reported to the insurance company during the last years. Classically these prices are calculated on the basis of a mixed Poisson model with a gamma mixing distribution. The mixing distribution models the car drivers' qualities across the insured portfolio. This is just one example for experience rating. In the classical context the price is equal to the expectation of the Bayesian posterior distribution. In some lines of business (especially third party liability and lines with exposure to extreme weather events) we that the real world data cannot be described well enough by the classical Poisson - gamma model. Therefore we investigate the influence of the mixing distribution on the posterior distribution conditional on the experienced number of claims. This enables the application of other - more risk adequate premium principles than the expectation principle. We introduce the inverse - gamma distribution as a new mixing distribution to model claim numbers and compare it to the classical gamma distribution. In both cases a closed analytic representation of the mixed distribution can be found: In the classic case the well known negative binomial distribution, in our new one a representation using the Bessel functions. Additionally we present numerical results about the tail behaviour of the mixed Poisson - inverse - gamma distribution. Finally we introduce the concept of resolution. It enables us to decide if the classification of risk groups via the number of experienced claims is a risk adequate procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Magda Schiegl, 2010. "About the Justification of Experience Rating: Bonus Malus System and a new Poisson Mixture Model," Papers 1009.4142, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1009.4142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1009.4142
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tzougas, George, 2020. "EM estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma regression model with varying dispersion: an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. George Tzougas, 2020. "EM Estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma Regression Model with Varying Dispersion: An Application to Insurance Ratemaking," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1009.4142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.