IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/apk/doctra/2203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multinationals, Monopsony, and Local Development: Evidence from the United Fruit Company

Author

Listed:
  • Esteban Méndez-Chacón

    (Department of Economic Research, Central Bank of Costa Rica)

  • Diana Van Patten

    (Yale University and NBER)

Abstract

This paper studies the role of large private sector companies in the development of local amenities. We use evidence from one of the largest multinationals of the 20th century: the United Fruit Company (UFCo). The firm was given a large land concession in Costa Rica—one of the so-called “Banana Republics"—from 1899 to 1984. Using administrative census data with census-block geo-references from 1973 to 2011, we implement a geographic regression discontinuity design that exploits a land assignment that is orthogonal to our outcomes of interest. We find that the firm had a positive and persistent effect on living standards. Company documents explain that a key concern at the time was to attract and maintain a sizable workforce, which induced the firm to invest heavily in local amenities— like the development of education and health infrastructure—that can account for our result. Consistent with this mechanism, we show, empirically and through a proposed model, that the firm’s investment efforts increase with worker mobility. ***Resumen: Este artículo estudia el papel de las grandes empresas privadas en el desarrollo de servicios locales. Utilizamos evidencia de una de las multinacionales más grandes del siglo XX: la United Fruit Company (UFCo). La firma recibió una gran concesión de tierras en Costa Rica, una de las llamadas “Repúblicas bananeras”—de 1899 a 1984. A partir de datos censales georreferenciados de 1973 a 2011, implementamos un diseño de regresión discontinua geográfica, que explota una asignación de terreno que es ortogonal a nuestros resultados de interés. Encontramos que la empresa tuvo un efecto positivo y persistente en los niveles de vida. Los documentos de la compañía explican que una preocupación clave en el momento era atraer y mantener una fuerza laboral, lo que indujo a la empresa a invertir fuertemente en servicios locales, como el desarrollo de la educación e infraestructura de salud, que pueden explicar nuestro resultado. Consistente con este mecanismo, mostramos, empíricamente y a través de un modelo propuesto, que los esfuerzos de inversión de la empresa aumentan con la movilidad de los trabajadores.

Suggested Citation

  • Esteban Méndez-Chacón & Diana Van Patten, 2022. "Multinationals, Monopsony, and Local Development: Evidence from the United Fruit Company," Documentos de Trabajo 2203, Banco Central de Costa Rica.
  • Handle: RePEc:apk:doctra:2203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorioinvestigaciones.bccr.fi.cr/handle/20.500.12506/364
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • N16 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apk:doctra:2203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Departamento de Investigación Económica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bccrrcr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.