IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aoh/conpro/2025i6p22-45.html

From Basics To Intelligent Tools: Accounting Information And Ai In Public‐Sector Internal Auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Dionisijev

    (Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Zorica Bozhinovska Lazarevska

    (Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Todor Tocev

    (Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia)

Abstract

This study examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in public sector internal auditing, focusing on the extent of AI adoption, the types of AI tools used, and the challenges faced by auditors in implementation. The research employs both descriptive statistical analysis and inferential techniques, including Spearman’s correlation and ANOVA, to assess the relationships between AI adoption and institutional factors. Findings indicate that while data analytics is the most commonly used AI tool, a significant proportion of respondents do not utilize AI in their auditing practices. The primary barriers to AI adoption include a lack of training, high costs, and concerns regarding data privacy. The study further reveals that AI usage varies depending on the type of institution in which they work. These insights contribute to the ongoing discussion on digital transformation in auditing, emphasizing the need for enhanced training programs and strategic investments to facilitate AI integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Dionisijev & Zorica Bozhinovska Lazarevska & Todor Tocev, 2025. "From Basics To Intelligent Tools: Accounting Information And Ai In Public‐Sector Internal Auditing," Proceedings of the International Conference "Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future" 002, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoh:conpro:2025:i:6:p:22-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.ukim.mk/bitstream/20.500.12188/34483/1/0002%20FROM%20BASICS%20TO%20INTELLIGENT%20TOOLS%20ACCOUNTING%20INFORMATION%20AND%20AI%20IN%20PUBLIC.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    2. Anastassia Fedyk & James Hodson & Natalya Khimich & Tatiana Fedyk, 2022. "Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 938-985, September.
    3. Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Carolin Geyer, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 596-615, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelvin K. F. Law & Michael Shen, 2025. "How Does Artificial Intelligence Shape Audit Firms?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 3641-3666, May.
    2. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    3. Zhou, Zhikai & Liu, Dewen & Chen, Zhongjie & Pancho, Martin, 2025. "Government adoption of generative artificial intelligence and ambidextrous innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Vitali, Sonia & Giuliani, Marco, 2024. "Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governance of artificial intelligence [Application of artificial intelligence for development of intelligent transport system in smart cities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 137-157.
    6. Sun, Guanglin & Ling, Zhencheng & Li, Yanru & Xie, Chang, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and financial fraud," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Li, Zhe & Yang, Huiyu & Zhang, Tingting, 2025. "Impact of enterprise artificial intelligence development on human capital structure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. António B. Moniz & Bettina-Johanna Krings, 2016. "Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Herbert Dawid & Michael Neugart, 2023. "Effects of technological change and automation on industry structure and (wage-)inequality: insights from a dynamic task-based model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-63, January.
    11. Nicolaj S{o}ndergaard Muhlbach, 2021. "occ2vec: A principal approach to representing occupations using natural language processing," Papers 2111.02528, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    12. Cecily Josten & Grace Lordan, 2022. "Automation and the changing nature of work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Costantini, Valeria & Sforna, Giorgia, 2020. "A dynamic CGE model for jointly accounting ageing population, automation and environmental tax reform. European Union as a case study," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 280-306.
    14. Michael Koch & Ilya Manuylov & Marcel Smolka, 2021. "Robots and Firms," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2553-2584.
    15. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    16. Iftekhairul Islam & Fahad Shaon, 2020. "If the Prospect of Some Occupations Are Stagnating With Technological Advancement? A Task Attribute Approach to Detect Employment Vulnerability," Papers 2001.02783, arXiv.org.
    17. Stemmler, Henry, 2019. "Does automation lead to de-industrialization in emerging economies? Evidence from Brazil," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 382, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    18. Arendt, Lukasz & Gałecka-Burdziak, Ewa & Núñez, Fernando & Pater, Robert & Usabiaga, Carlos, 2023. "Skills requirements across task-content groups in Poland: What online job offers tell us," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoh:conpro:2025:i:6:p:22-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikolina Palamidovska-Sterjadovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efukimk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.