IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A lost sales inventory model with a compound poisson demand pattern


  • SPRINGAEL, Johan


In this paper, we study the decision problem of a retailer, who wants to optimize the amount of shelf inventory of a particular product, given that the demand for the product is stochastic and replenishment lead times (from the store’s stockroom to the shelf) are negligible. The shelf inventory is managed according to a (0,B*)-inventory policy: when the shelf inventory is sold out, the retailer gets a fixed amount of B* units from the central stockroom to replenish the shelf inventory. To adequately reflect the shopping behavior of retail customers, the demand process is modeled as a compound Poisson process, with Poisson distributed purchase quantities. When the purchase quantity of a customer exceeds the amount of shelf inventory still available, the unsatisfied demand is considered to be lost sales. As the demand process is stochastic, the runout time of the shelf in-ventory will be stochastic too. The costs per cycle related to keeping inventory on the shelf can be split up into three components: average holding costs (which may be related to the scarcity of shelf space), a fixed handling cost (per replenishment trip), and an average lost sales cost. The purpose of the model is to determine the value of B* that minimizes the average total cost per time unit.

Suggested Citation

  • SPRINGAEL, Johan & VAN NIEUWENHUYSE, Inneke, 2005. "A lost sales inventory model with a compound poisson demand pattern," Working Papers 2005017, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2005017

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Huck, Steffen & Normann, Hans-Theo & Oechssler, Jorg, 2000. "Does information about competitors' actions increase or decrease competition in experimental oligopoly markets?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 39-57, January.
    2. Jan Potters & Sigrid Suetens, 2009. "Cooperation in Experimental Games of Strategic Complements and Substitutes," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 1125-1147.
    3. Potters, Jan & Rockenbach, Bettina & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Damme, Eric, 2004. "Collusion under yardstick competition: an experimental study," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 1017-1038, September.
    4. Rotemberg, Julio J, 1994. "Human Relations in the Workplace," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(4), pages 684-717, August.
    5. Martin, Stephen, 1996. "R & D joint ventures and tacit product market collusion," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 733-741, April.
    6. Altavilla, Carlo & Luini, Luigi & Sbriglia, Patrizia, 2006. "Social learning in market games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 632-652, December.
    7. Hans Normann & Brian Wallace, 2004. "The Impact of the Termination Rule in Cooperation Experiments," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 04/11, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Jul 2004.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Sachs, Anna-Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "The data-driven newsvendor with censored demand observations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 28-36.
    2. Kouki, Chaaben & Jouini, Oualid, 2015. "On the effect of lifetime variability on the performance of inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 23-34.

    More about this item


    Discrete inventory models; Compound Poisson process; Lost sales; Jonquière’s function;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2005017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joeri Nys). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.