IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial analysts' concerns, media exposure and corporate environmental communication. Accounting for simultaneous relationships in an international perspective


  • AERTS, Walter
  • CORMIER, Denis
  • MAGNAN, Michel


The purpose of this study is to provide an integrated analysis of corporate environmental communication strategies using stakeholder theory. More precisely, we argue that there is a symbiotic relationship between managerial decisions with respect to environmental disclosure and stakeholders. On the one hand, stakeholders’ claims determine managerial decisions with respect to corporate environmental disclosure. On the other hand, managerial decisions may affect key stakeholders’ actions and decisions, more specifically financial analysts’ forecasts. We investigate three research questions: (1) What are the determinants for voluntary environmental disclosure? (2) Does voluntary environmental disclosure allow analysts to make better forecasts? (3) Is there a difference in the determination and implications from environmental disclosure between continental European and North American firms? The sample comprises continental European firms (Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands) and North American firms (Canada and the United States). Our measure of environmental disclosure reflects web disclosure, which encompasses print-based documents (e.g., environmental reporting in pdf) as well as web only disclosures (e.g., html documents or videos). Through distinct determinant regressions using simultaneous equations, we find a significant relationship between business stakeholders’ concerns and environmental disclosure for North American firms, while conversely, we find a weak statistical effect for continental European firms. Environmental news exposure is a significant determinant of environmental disclosure in both continents. Findings also suggest that financial markets’ concerns are relevant as a determinant of environmental disclosure. Concerning the relevance of environmental disclosure for financial analysts’ earnings forecasts, results show that print environmental disclosure is associated with a decrease in analysts' forecast dispersion both in continental Europe and in North America. Furthermore, environmental disclosure is less important a factor in explaining forecast dispersion for those firms that are followed by many analysts. However, in North America, it appears that analysts use environmental disclosure differently depending on the diffusion media (i.e., web or paper). It seems that in North America, the more discretionary is the information disclosed, the less it is relevant for market participants. Moreover, in continental Europe, environmental disclosure increases dispersion of analysts' forecasts for firms operating in more environmentally sensitive industries. Findings also suggest that for assessing information relevance for market participants, it is important to control for the endogenous effect of a firm’s decision to disclose information as well as its exposition to media.

Suggested Citation

  • AERTS, Walter & CORMIER, Denis & MAGNAN, Michel, 2004. "Financial analysts' concerns, media exposure and corporate environmental communication. Accounting for simultaneous relationships in an international perspective," Working Papers 2005003, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2005003

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Huck, Steffen & Normann, Hans-Theo & Oechssler, Jorg, 2000. "Does information about competitors' actions increase or decrease competition in experimental oligopoly markets?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 39-57, January.
    2. Jan Potters & Sigrid Suetens, 2009. "Cooperation in Experimental Games of Strategic Complements and Substitutes," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 1125-1147.
    3. Potters, Jan & Rockenbach, Bettina & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Damme, Eric, 2004. "Collusion under yardstick competition: an experimental study," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 1017-1038, September.
    4. Rotemberg, Julio J, 1994. "Human Relations in the Workplace," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(4), pages 684-717, August.
    5. Martin, Stephen, 1996. "R & D joint ventures and tacit product market collusion," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 733-741, April.
    6. Altavilla, Carlo & Luini, Luigi & Sbriglia, Patrizia, 2006. "Social learning in market games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 632-652, December.
    7. Hans Normann & Brian Wallace, 2004. "The Impact of the Termination Rule in Cooperation Experiments," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 04/11, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Jul 2004.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Analysts' forecasts; Corporate disclosure; Stakeholder theory; Media exposure; Environmental disclosure; Environmental performance; Web reporting;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2005003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joeri Nys). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.