IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ams/ndfwpp/04-11.html

A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing

Author

Listed:
  • Diks, C.G.H.
  • Panchenko, V.

    (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Abstract

Upon illustrating how smoothing may cause over-rejection in nonparametric tests for Granger non-causality, we propose a new test statistic for which problems of this type can be avoided. We develop asymptotic theory for the new test statistic, and perform a simulation study to investigate the properties of the new test in comparison with its natural counterpart, the Hiemstra-Jones test. Our simulation results indicate that, if the bandwidth tends to zero at the appropriate rate as the sample size increases, the size of the new test remains close to nominal, while the power remains large. Transforming the time series to uniform marginals improves the behavior of both tests. In applications to Standard and Poor's index volumes and returns, the Hiemstra-Jones test suggests that volume Granger-causes returns. However, the evidence for this gets weaker if we carefully apply the recommendations suggested by our simulation study.

Suggested Citation

  • Diks, C.G.H. & Panchenko, V., 2004. "A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing," CeNDEF Working Papers 04-11, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:ams:ndfwpp:04-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cendef.uva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/amsterdam-school-of-economics/amsterdam-school-of-economics-research-institute/cendef/working-papers-2004/0411.pdf?1417180784737
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ams:ndfwpp:04-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cees C.G. Diks (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cnuvanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.