IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajf/louvlr/2022009.html

Is cross-listing a panacea for improving earnings quality? The case of H- and B-share firms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür
  • Chen, Shimin
  • Ni, Serene Xu
  • Thewissen, James

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/LFIN, Belgium)

Abstract

This study examines whether cross-listed Chinese H- and B-share firms exhibit higher earnings quality relative to non-cross-listed A-share firms based on seven accounting- and market-based earnings quality attributes, including accrual quality, persistence, predictability, smoothness, conservatism, timeliness and value relevance. We find that earnings quality does not differ between cross-listed and non-cross listed firms in terms of accrual quality, timeliness and value relevance, and that H- and B-share firms report earnings with lower quality in terms of persistence and predictability. We also find that the B-firms report smoother earnings, while the H-firms report more conservative earnings. The results of a battery of cross-sectional, endogeneity and sensitivity analyses either confirm our primary findings of no earnings quality difference or reveal lower earnings quality for cross-listed firms than for non-cross-listed firms. Considering that cross-listing in China is primarily driven by government decisions, our findings suggest that, without proper incentives, cross-listing is not likely to be a panacea for higher quality financial reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Chen, Shimin & Ni, Serene Xu & Thewissen, James, 2022. "Is cross-listing a panacea for improving earnings quality? The case of H- and B-share firms in China," LIDAM Reprints LFIN 2022009, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    • Handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2022009
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102113
    Note: In: International Review of Financial Analysis, 2022, vol. 81, 102113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yin, Wenjing & Wang, Gaomiao & Yu, Yumiao, 2025. "Watchdogs of greenwashing: The role of long-term institutional cross-ownership," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Ma, Rufei & Chen, Yuhua & Ji, Qiang & Zhai, Pengxiang, 2025. "How does environmental regulatory stringency shape ESG? Evidence from cross-listing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB).
    3. Zhan, Yunqiu & Gao, Dongfei & Feng, Muzi & Yan, Shen, 2025. "Digital finance, non-agricultural employment, and the income-increasing effect on rural households," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2022009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Séverine De Visscher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lfuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.