IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiz/louvar/2024012.html

Inference for aggregate efficiency: Theory and guidelines for practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Simar, Léopold

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

  • Zelenyuk, Valentin
  • Zhao, Shirong

Abstract

We expand and develop further the recently developed framework for the inference about the aggregate efficiency, extending the existing theory and providing guidelines for practitioners. In Monte Carlo simulations, we thoroughly examine the performance of the various improvement methods (compared with the original CLT results) for the aggregate input-oriented and output-oriented efficiency for different ranges of small samples and different dimensions of the production model. From the simulations, we conclude that: (i) when the sample sizes are relatively small (around 200 and less), the full variance correction method (adapted from Simar et al., 2023) with the data sharpening method (adapted from Nguyen et al., 2022) generally provides a better performance; (ii) when the sample sizes are relatively large, the full variance correction method without the data sharpening method is expected to perform better than the other suitable methods known to date. Finally, we use two well-known empirical data sets to illustrate the practical implementations and the differences across the existing methods to facilitate their use by practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Simar, Léopold & Zelenyuk, Valentin & Zhao, Shirong, 2024. "Inference for aggregate efficiency: Theory and guidelines for practitioners," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2024012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
  • Handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2024012
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.028
    Note: In: European Journal of Operational Research, 2024, vol. 316 (1), p. 240-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Kai & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2025. "Likelihood-ratio test for technological differences in two-stage data envelopment analysis for panel data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(2), pages 644-663.
    2. Léopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk & Shirong Zhao, 2025. "Statistical inference for Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1675-1703, August.
    3. Zelenyuk, Valentin & Zhao, Shirong, 2024. "Russell and slack-based measures of efficiency: A unifying framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 867-876.
    4. Ali Emrouznejad & Victor Podinovski & Vincent Charles & Chixiao Lu & Amir Moradi-Motlagh, 2025. "Rajiv Banker’s lasting impact on data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1225-1264, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2024012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nadja Peiffer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.