IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/agy/dpaper/202412.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digitalization, Decentralization and a Culture of Learning: Sowing the Seeds for Effective and Sustained Public Sector Rightsizing

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Mendoza

    (IDinsight)

  • Alex Brillantes

    (University of the Philippines Diliman)

  • Miguel Paje

    (ACERD)

  • Ainna Comia

    (ACERD)

  • Karl Emmanuel Ruiz

    (ACERD)

  • Edilberto C. de Jesus

    (Asian Institute of Management)

Abstract

In the Philippines, the strengths and weaknesses of both the central and local bureaucracies have been revealed by the recent pandemic, encompassing coordination hurdles, limited capacities, complex partnerships, data deficiencies, and the imperative of digitalization. With the nation striving to build back better after the pandemic, calls for public sector reform— and the need to rightsize the government—reflect the increased urgency for more effective and improved provision of public services. Government rightsizing can be understood to reach the end goal of better provision of public services—guided by answering the inter-related questions of What to produce, How to produce and For whom to produce these public services. Hence, rightsizing may entail expanded public sector investments and activities in some key areas, and rationalization and streamlining in others. Rather than produce yet another rightsizing study recommending specific spending cuts and rationalization, and investments, this paper takes a different approach by focusing on the bigger picture of government rightsizing in the Philippines. It reviews the literature and policy experience on rightsizing, as well as the emerging enabling conditions for this. It supplements this broad review with key informant interviews in order to develop a proposed policy framework (along with an operational guide) for organizing more effective and sustained rightsizing in the Philippine public sector, offering guidance and insights to legislators for finalizing (and implementing) the House Bill No. 7240 which shall be known upon enactment as the National Government Rightsizing Act. The goal here is to see beyond the immediate details of individual agencies, projects and programs that require rightsizing analysis—rather to look at the broader canvass of the role of the State and way reformists have approached the rightsizing agenda. With a focus on the national government, this paper argues that in order to set the stage for more effective and sustained rightsizing, reformists need to take a step back and support some key enablers and possible game-changers, such as digitalization, the present impetus of decentralization, and a culture of learning with strong monitoring, evaluation, and data-enabled decisionmaking. There are key legislative reforms under the Marcos administration (with attendant budgetary implications) along these lines, which this paper supports with evidence and specific policy recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Mendoza & Alex Brillantes & Miguel Paje & Ainna Comia & Karl Emmanuel Ruiz & Edilberto C. de Jesus, 2024. "Digitalization, Decentralization and a Culture of Learning: Sowing the Seeds for Effective and Sustained Public Sector Rightsizing," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202412, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
  • Handle: RePEc:agy:dpaper:202412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/14WK0k-yt6_UOiq-vKg45xp5qAoYBwLSf/view
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    government rightsizing; digitalization; decentralization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agy:dpaper:202412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jat Tancangco (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deadmph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.