IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/373354.html

Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Biochar Activated Carbon and Synthesis Gas Electricity with Commercially Available Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Bergman, Richard
  • Gu, Hongmei
  • Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
  • Liang, Shaobo
  • Forest Products Laboratory

Abstract

This report presents a compilation of research conducted on the life-cycle assessment analysis for processing raw material woody biomass into biochar activated carbon (AC) and synthesis gas (syngas) for electricity production. The study was part of the United States Department of Agriculture Biomass Research and Development Initiative project with a broader goal of an integrated assessment of biomass feedstock production, logistics, conversion, distribution, and end use focused on a novel thermochemical conversion system using woody biomass feedstocks. Cradle-to-grave analysis of the syngas electricity supply chain included upstream processes of the feedstock procurement and preparation life-cycle stages, core process of the thermochemical conversion (woody biomass carbonization) stage, and then downstream processes with syngas storage and combustion (use) at the generator for electricity production. Cradle-to-gate analysis of the biochar AC supply chain included upstream processes of feedstock procurement and preparation, the core process of thermochemical conversion (woody biomass carbonization), and then the downstream process of steam activation of the biochar into high-grade AC. The results of the comparative analysis revealed that a notable decrease in the global warming impact can be achieved through substitution of coal AC with biochar AC. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 39% lower for the biochar AC system compared with the coal AC system. However, GHG emissions were higher for syngas electricity than for electricity from natural gas when biochar sequestration effect was not accounted for, but this was reversed when the sequestration effect was accounted for. The primary driver of GHG emissions for both bioproducts was the thermochemical conversion stage (the core process) because carbonization required propane to fuel the endothermic reaction. The second greatest source of GHG emissions for biochar AC was the steam activation process. An alternative scenario using low-energy syngas generated from the carbonization stage (not currently being done) showed that displacing propane decreased GHG emissions substantially. Therefore, optimization of the supply chain would probably improve all environmental impacts for the two bioproducts analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bergman, Richard & Gu, Hongmei & Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda & Liang, Shaobo & Forest Products Laboratory, 2019. "Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Biochar Activated Carbon and Synthesis Gas Electricity with Commercially Available Alternatives," USDA Miscellaneous 373354, United States Department of Agriculture.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:373354
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.373354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/373354/files/FPL-GTR-270.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.373354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:373354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.