IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usazwp/290380.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Culture Matter? A Test of the Harrison Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Colin A. Moore
  • Elizabeth Mubanga Chishimba
  • Paul N. Wilson

Abstract

This study utilizes unique data from the World Values Survey to test the hypothesis that fatalism and the practice of the Golden Rule influence the economic development of nations. We use standard econometric models that account for endogeneity to understand the relative roles of culture, productivity, institutions, and geography in explaining human flourishing. Our analysis supports Harrison’s cultural hypothesis and demonstrates that fatalism and altruism’s explanatory powers, in our full model, are no less powerful than productivity, institutions, and geography in explaining economic performance. However, transforming existing fatalistic and altruistic attitudes in a positive direction using public policy to provide greater support for human flourishing may prove more challenging than overcoming other development constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin A. Moore & Elizabeth Mubanga Chishimba & Paul N. Wilson, 2019. "Does Culture Matter? A Test of the Harrison Hypothesis," Working Papers 290380, University of Arizona, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usazwp:290380
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290380/files/Working%20Paper%202019-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usazwp:290380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauazus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.