IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/undprp/267062.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding Policy And Institutional Innovations To Harness Knowledge For The Realization Of The Mdgs In Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Conceicao, Pedro
  • Odusola, Ayodele

Abstract

Regional Bureau for Africa, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York. I Introduction: Evidences from international publications on the MDGs have shown that knowledge, experience and the know-how of fast tracking the MDGs abound 2 . Africa is endowed with indigenous and localknowledge; however, such innovations are characterized with information asymmetry which weakens the widespread application of innovative ideas that could have transformed its economic and development landscape. Due to information asymmetry, we often prefer to look for innovations that are either inferior or of the same standards from distant locations but not easily adaptable to the African context. Due to the lack of a sharing network, most innovative ideas from the region have become localized and in some instances, the indigenous innovatorsadopt an indifference attitude, mostly leading to indirectrestriction of the innovation, among the innovators andproducers 3 . The lack of network for sharing innovative ideas has resulted into deficit in the incremental innovation progress in the continent. A review of experiences across the continent has shown that new body of knowledge is being built around policies and institutional innovations that are driving progress on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The emerging evidence tends to suggest that achieving the MDGsin the region requires a substantial reorientation of developmentpolicies and institutions to focus on the use of new and established processes and practices that have propelled progress across the various Goals and countries in Africa. To be able to capture relevant changes taking place on the implementation of MDGs related interventions, innovations are looked at in three broad categories: in terms of policy orientation that have created conducive environment for progress, business process (covering marketing, financing and operational issues) and products or the service (focusing on organizational and social impact) – the three ps: policy, process and product. Three main broad areas are emphasized in addressing the issue of innovations on the MDGs: the goals on poverty reduction, education and health. They focus on one area each where the region is doing very well (education) and lagging behind (health goals) and having a moderate progress (poverty).

Suggested Citation

  • Conceicao, Pedro & Odusola, Ayodele, 2010. "Understanding Policy And Institutional Innovations To Harness Knowledge For The Realization Of The Mdgs In Africa," UNDP Africa Research Discussion Papers 267062, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:undprp:267062
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267062/files/UNDERSTANDING_POLICY_AND_INSTITUTIONAL_INNOVATIONS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267062/files/UNDERSTANDING_POLICY_AND_INSTITUTIONAL_INNOVATIONS.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2006. "Linking Agricultural Innovations to Knowledge Sharing in Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 10746, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ochieng, Cosmas Milton Obote, 2007. "Development through Positive Deviance and its Implications for Economic Policy Making and Public Administration in Africa: The Case of Kenyan Agricultural Development, 1930-2005," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 454-479, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:undprp:267062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.africa.undp.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.