IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unasrr/234374.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of the Screening Procedures of the June Area Survey on the Number of Farms Estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Abreu, Denise A.
  • McCarthy, Jaki S.
  • Colburn, Leslie A.

Abstract

The National Agricultural Statistics Service uses its annual June Area Survey (JAS) as the vehicle to generate annual estimates of farm numbers. These estimates are compared to ones obtained from the quinquennial Census of Agriculture (conducted for all years ending in 2 and 7). The annual estimate of the number of farms from the JAS has been declining steadily between censuses, especially between the 2002 and 2007 Censuses. Furthermore, these have been considerably lower than farm numbers from the census and the difference cannot simply be attributed to sampling error. Some insight into this issue was provided when the 2007 Classification Error Survey, a census follow-up qualitative study, revealed that agricultural operations were being incorrectly classified as non-agricultural during the screening procedures of the JAS. Therefore, to determine the extent of misclassification resulting from the operational screening procedures for the June survey and its immediate impact on number of farms estimation, a post- June Survey intensive screening called the Farm Numbers Research Project was undertaken in the fall of 2009. The study focused primarily on the newly rotated-in segments which comprised 20 percent of the 2009 JAS sample. It targeted non-agricultural, refusal and inaccessible tracts in these newly rotated-in segments. The primary purpose of the survey was to verify farm/nonfarm status, utilizing a survey instrument that contained questions similar to those on the JAS screening form. The study introduced the concepts of subsampling and subtracts, which are not routinely part of the JAS. Also, enumerators were instructed to screen residential areas of onehalf acre or less per parcel, yet another deviation from standard JAS procedures. The results of this effort are presented in this report.

Suggested Citation

  • Abreu, Denise A. & McCarthy, Jaki S. & Colburn, Leslie A., 2010. "Impact of the Screening Procedures of the June Area Survey on the Number of Farms Estimates," NASS Research Reports 234374, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:234374
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234374/files/FNRP%20report%20final%20Jan%202011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.234374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda J. Young & Michael Jacobsen, 2022. "Sample Design and Estimation When Using a Web-Scraped List Frame and Capture-Recapture Methods," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 261-279, June.
    2. Abreu, Denise A. & Lamas, Andrea C. & Sang, Hailin & Lopiano, Kenneth K. & Arroway, Pam & Young, Linda J., 2011. "On the Feasibility of Using NASS’s Sampling List Frame to Evaluate Misclassification Errors of the June Area Survey," NASS Research Reports 235030, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    3. repec:ags:unassr:235030 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Linda J. Young & Andrea C. Lamas & Denise A. Abreu, 2017. "The 2012 Census of Agriculture: A Capture–Recapture Analysis," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 523-539, December.
    5. Lopiano, Kenneth K. & Lamas, Andrea C. & Abreu, Denise A. & Arroway, Pam & Young, Linda J., 2011. "Adjusting the June Area Survey Estimate of the Number of U.S. Farms for Misclassification and Non-response," NASS Research Reports 235033, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    6. repec:ags:unassr:235033 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Sang Hailin & Lopiano Kenneth K. & Abreu Denise A. & Lamas Andrea C. & Young Linda J. & Arroway Pam, 2017. "Adjusting for Misclassification: A Three-Phase Sampling Approach," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 207-222, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:234374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nass.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.