IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea15/196897.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economics of Oversized Cyclones in the Cotton Ginning Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sotelo-Sosa, Sergio
  • Acharya, Ram N.
  • Funk, Paul

Abstract

Cost of reducing pollution to meet increasingly stringent air quality standards particularly for the U.S. cotton ginning industry is rising overtime. Most industry participants use cyclones to control air pollutants. These cyclones have no moving parts and their initial investment costs are relatively low. However, they require a substantial amount of energy to run them. Since the electricity rates are rising, the ginning industry is constantly looking for opportunities to increase cyclone operating efficiency and reduce the cost of complying with the local, state, and federal air pollution standards. Dust particles of size PM10 and PM2.5 are the pollutants of main concern for the industry. Researchers in the USDA’s Southwest Ginning Lab in Las Cruces are conducting experiments to evaluate whether using bigger diameter cyclones at lower inlet velocities can reduce the energy costs. If these experiments show that the bigger diameter cyclones can achieve the same level of air pollution control, it may substantially reduce energy cost and boost ginning industry profitability. This study uses the results from the ginning lab to evaluate the impact of using bigger cyclones at lower inlet velocity to reduce energy use, decrease emission, and increase profitability of the ginning industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotelo-Sosa, Sergio & Acharya, Ram N. & Funk, Paul, 2014. "Economics of Oversized Cyclones in the Cotton Ginning Industry," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196897, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea15:196897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/196897/files/Economic%20Analysis-Documentation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Environmental Economics and Policy; Financial Economics; Health Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea15:196897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.