IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea15/196693.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adoption of Irrigation Technology and Best Management Practices under Climate Risks: Evidence from Arkansas, United States

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Ying
  • Huang, Qiuqiong
  • West, Grant

Abstract

Water shortage is likely intensified by climate change. Although advanced irrigation technologies and agricultural water management practices are widely promoted, farmers’ adoption behavior is not well understood in the climate change context. This study helps fill this gap by assessing how climate risk affects such adoption. We construct moment-based climate risk measures that better reflect its volatility and extremes and apply them in multiple discrete choice modeling procedures. We also extend existing literature focusing solely on irrigation technologies to include conservation practices such as the Best Management Practices (BMPs), thereby providing a more complete picture of conservation practices. Jointly using the Arkansas subset of USDA Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey and Census of Agriculture over years and multiple climate records, we find climate risk plays a role in the adoption of advanced irrigation technologies and BMPs, and suggest the policy relevance of the consideration of climate risk in understanding farmers’ technology adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Ying & Huang, Qiuqiong & West, Grant, 2015. "Adoption of Irrigation Technology and Best Management Practices under Climate Risks: Evidence from Arkansas, United States," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196693, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea15:196693
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.196693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/196693/files/adoption%20paper011215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Risk and Uncertainty;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea15:196693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.