IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea14/162462.html

Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Best Management Practices in Kentucky

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Hua
  • Hu, Wuyang

Abstract

This article investigates farmers’ willingness to participate in the best management practices (BMPs) through a proposed Water Quality Trading (WQT) program in Kentucky. This analysis includes two parts; the first part is to investigate the factors influencing farmers’ current usage of BMPs; the second part is to estimate farmers’ willingness to implement BMPs given different levels of compensation proposed through a survey. The results show that farmers who participate in conservation programs from the USDA are more likely to use BMPs, but these farmers may not accept the offer to implement additional BMPs. Farmers’ perceptions about BMPs are more likely to convince them to adopt additional BMPs than the amount of compensation/cost-share offered through WQT. The results also find that the probabilities of fencing off animals and building up waste storage facility are positively correlated with the levels of compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Hua & Hu, Wuyang, 2014. "Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Best Management Practices in Kentucky," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162462, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea14:162462
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162462/files/Farmers_%20Willingness%20to%20Participate%20in%20Best%20Management%20Practices%20in%20Kentucky.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.162462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. He, Fei & Lai, John & Court, Christa D. & Borisova, Tatiana & Athearn, Kevin R., 2023. "Producers Willingness to Adopt Best Management Practices in Floridan Aquifer Region," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335650, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. David Conner & Jennifer Miller & Asim Zia & Qingbin Wang & Heather Darby, 2016. "Conjoint Analysis of Farmers’ Response to Conservation Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    4. repec:ags:aaea22:335650 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea14:162462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.