IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/274681.html

Randomization Inference for Difference-in-Differences with Few Treated Clusters

Author

Listed:
  • MacKinnon, James G.
  • Webb, Matthew D.

Abstract

Inference using difference-in-differences with clustered data requires care. Previous research has shown that, when there are few treated clusters, t tests based on cluster- robust variance estimators (CRVEs) severely over-reject, different variants of the wild cluster bootstrap can either over-reject or under-reject dramatically, and procedures based on randomization inference show promise. We study two randomization inference (RI) procedures. A procedure based on estimated coeffcients, which is essentially the one proposed by Conley and Taber (2011), has excellent power but may not perform well when the treated clusters are atypical. We therefore propose a new RI procedure based on t statistics. It typically performs better under the null, except when there is just one treated cluster, but at the cost of some power loss. Two empirical examples demonstrate that alternative procedures can yield dramatically different inferences.

Suggested Citation

  • MacKinnon, James G. & Webb, Matthew D., 2018. "Randomization Inference for Difference-in-Differences with Few Treated Clusters," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274681, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274681
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274681/files/qed_wp_1355.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.