IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Agricultural Trade Liberalization Help the Poor in Tunisia? A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hassine, Nadia Belhaj
  • Décaluwé, Bernard

Abstract

Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models have gained continuously in popularity as an empirical tool for assessing the impact of trade liberalization on growth, poverty and equity. In recent years, there have been attempts to extend the scope of CGE trade models to the analysis of the interaction of agricultural growth, poverty and income distribution. Conventional models ignore however the channels linking technical change in agriculture, trade openness and poverty. This study seeks to incorporate econometric evidence of these linkages into a dynamic sequential CGE model, to estimate the impact of alternative trade liberalization scenarios on welfare, poverty and equity. The analysis uses the latent class stochastic frontier model in investigating the influence of international trade on agricultural technological change and productivity. The estimated productivity gains induced from a more opened trade regime are combined with a general equilibrium analysis of trade liberalization to evaluate the direct welfare benefits of poor farmers and the indirect income and prices outcomes. These effects are then used to infer the impact on poverty using the traditional top-down approach and the Tunisian household survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassine, Nadia Belhaj & Décaluwé, Bernard, 2008. "Does Agricultural Trade Liberalization Help the Poor in Tunisia? A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 331710, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331710/files/3839.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Austria, Myrna S., 2001. "Liberalization and Regional Integration: The Philippines' Strategy to Global Competitiveness," Discussion Papers DP 2001-09, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Austria, Myrna S., 2001. "Liberalization and Regional Integration: The Philippines’ Strategy for Global Competitiveness," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2001 Vol. XXVIII No. , Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    3. Medalla, Erlinda M. & Austria, Myrna S., 1996. "A Study on the Trade and Investment Policies of Developing Countries: The Case of the Philippines," Discussion Papers DP 1996-03, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cororaton, Caesar B. & Corong, Erwin L. & Cockburn, John, 2009. "Agricultural Price Distortions, Poverty and Inequality in the Philippines," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52790, World Bank.
    2. Lazaro, Dorothea C. & Wignaraja, Ganeshan & De Guzman, Genevieve, 2011. "Factors Affecting Use or Nonuse of Free Trade Agreements in the Philippines," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2009 Vol. XXXVI No. 2, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    3. Austria, Myrna S., 2000. "Competitiveness of the Philippine IT Industry: What Lies Ahead," Philippine Journal of Development JPD 2000 Vol. XXVII No. 2, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    4. Cororaton, Caesar B., 2008. "The Philippines: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications," IFPRI discussion papers 827, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Wignaraja, Ganeshan & Lazaro, Dorothea & DeGuzman, Genevieve, 2010. "FTAs and Philippine Business: Evidence from Transport, Food, and Electronics Firms," ADBI Working Papers 185, Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.