IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaesp/413438.html

Economic Impacts of Abolishing Vertical Integration in the US Pork Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Giannakas, Konstantinos

Abstract

This paper develops a multi-market framework of analysis of vertical relationships in pork production and game theoretic models of heterogeneous firms to examine the economic, market and welfare impacts of abolishing vertical integration in the US pork sector. Different scenarios on the causes of vertical integration and the potential states of nature that can emerge after the removal of this vertical market arrangement are considered within this framework. Analytical results are consistent across the different scenarios and forms of strategic interactions between pork producers and indicate that the abolishment of vertical integration in the US pork sector will hurt pork consumers, integrated pork producers and the hog producers involved. The only beneficiaries of this policy/change will be the non-integrated pork producers. However, the gains of these non-integrated pork producers are less than the consumer, hog producer and integrated pork producer losses, resulting in net social welfare losses from this policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2026. "Economic Impacts of Abolishing Vertical Integration in the US Pork Industry," Staff Papers 413438, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaesp:413438
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.413438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/413438/files/AES_2026-01-30_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.413438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaesp:413438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.