IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaesp/413404.html

Effect of Risk Perception on Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Sukharomana, Renu
  • Supalla, Raymond J.

Abstract

These empirical results suggest that CVM can yield theoretically consistent results regarding the quantity of the good being purchased, even for complex goods which consumers are not used to valuing. Consumers expressed a higher WTP when they believed that they were purchasing a larger volume of the public good, defined as protection from nitrates only versus protection from all contaminants. They also expressed higher WTP when perceived risk was greater. On the other hand, consumer subjective risk perceptions understated actual risk, as measured by USEPA public health standards, which led to a downward bias in WTP. This suggests that public information programs may be needed before consumers will provide an optimum level of support for public goods, such as water quality programs, It also suggests that consumer purchases of private goods to avert the consequences of adverse water quality are also less than optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukharomana, Renu & Supalla, Raymond J., 1998. "Effect of Risk Perception on Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality," Staff Papers 413404, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaesp:413404
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.413404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/413404/files/AES_1998-08_paper3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.413404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaesp:413404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.