IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/motuwp/290573.html

Lessons Learned from the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Leining, Catherine
  • Kerr, Suzi

Abstract

The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) was launched in 2008 following more than a decade of policy deliberation on how emission pricing could support New Zealand’s contribution to international climate change mitigation efforts. Reflecting the unique emissions and economic profile of New Zealand, New Zealand’s regulatory culture, and lessons learned from earlier environmental markets, including within New Zealand, it pioneered many ETS features. Examples include design for coverage of all economic sectors and major greenhouse gases (GHGs); an upstream point of obligation in the energy sectors with opt-in by major downstream users; output-based free allocation to eligible emissions-intensive, trade-exposed activities where the firms involved were not necessarily points of obligation; zero free allocation to energy-sector participants in recognition of the fact that they could pass on emission prices; and a monitoring, reporting and verification system based on self-assessment with audits and penalties to deter non-compliance. From 2008 to mid-2015, the NZ ETS operated without a cap on domestic emissions but instead was nested within the international Kyoto Protocol cap, enabled by buy-and-sell linkages to the Kyoto market. Legislative amendments to moderate the system’s impact combined with an oversupply of units in the international market contributed to low domestic emission prices in recent years, and policy uncertainty has obscured the system’s long-term price signal. While the NZ ETS may have had a small impact on the forestry sector, officials have found no evidence that it has contributed significantly to domestic mitigation. From 2012 through to mid-2015, participants predominantly met their NZ ETS obligations by purchasing overseas Kyoto units at low cost. The NZ ETS did enable the government to meet New Zealand’s international obligations for the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (2008–2012) with a substantial unit surplus. In 2015, the NZ ETS delinked from the Kyoto market and it currently operates as a domestic-only system. The government is reviewing the system in 2016. The system requires changes to align with New Zealand’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) under the 2015 Paris Agreement and to effectively support New Zealand’s decarbonisation pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • Leining, Catherine & Kerr, Suzi, 2016. "Lessons Learned from the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme," Motu Working Papers 290573, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:motuwp:290573
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290573/files/16_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carver, Thomas & Dawson, Patrick & Kerr, Suzi, 2017. "Including Forestry in an Emissions Trading Scheme: Lessons from New Zealand," Motu Working Papers 290515, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    3. Coleman, Andrew, 2018. "Forest-based carbon sequestration, and the role of forward, futures, and carbon-lending markets: A comparative institutions approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 95-104.
    4. Leining, Catherine & Kerr, Suzi, 2019. "Managing Scarcity and Ambition in the NZ ETS," Motu Working Papers 290395, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    5. Ormsby, Judd & Kerr, Suzi, 2016. "The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme de-link from Kyoto: impacts on banking and prices," Motu Working Papers 290566, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    6. Habib Zaman Khan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Ielemia K Ielemia, 2023. "Organic versus cosmetic efforts of the quality of carbon reporting by top New Zealand firms. Does market reward or penalise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 686-703, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:motuwp:290573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/motuenz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.