IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/midips/196830.html

Does The Current Sugar Market Structure Benefit Consumers And Sugarcane Growers?

Author

Listed:
  • Chisanga, Brian
  • Meyer, Ferdinand H.
  • Winter-Nelson, Alex
  • Sitko, Nicholas J.

Abstract

The market structure in Zambia’s sugar industry is highly concentrated, leading to consumers paying higher prices than expected given the low cost of sugar production in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Chisanga, Brian & Meyer, Ferdinand H. & Winter-Nelson, Alex & Sitko, Nicholas J., 2014. "Does The Current Sugar Market Structure Benefit Consumers And Sugarcane Growers?," Food Security International Development Policy Syntheses 196830, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:midips:196830
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.196830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/196830/files/ps_69.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.196830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul C. Samboko & Mitelo Subakanya & Cliff Dlamini, 2017. "Potential biofuel feedstocks and production in Zambia," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-47, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Resnick, Danielle & Haggblade, Steven & Babu, Suresh & Hendriks, Sheryl L. & Mather, David, 2018. "The Kaleidoscope Model of policy change: Applications to food security policy in Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-120.
    3. Faaiqa Hartley & Dirk van Seventer & Paul Chimuka Samboko & Channing Arndt, 2019. "Economy-wide implications of biofuel production in Zambia," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 213-232, March.
    4. Faaiqa Hartley & Dirk van Seventer & Paul Chimuka Samboko & Channing Arndt, 2019. "Economy-wide implications of biofuel production in Zambia," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 213-232, March.
    5. Paul C. Samboko & Mitelo Subakanya & Cliff Dlamini, 2017. "Potential biofuel feedstocks and production in Zambia," WIDER Working Paper Series 047, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Haggblade, Steven & Babu, Suresh & Harris, Jody & Mkandawire, Elizabeth & Nthani, Dorothy & Hendriks, Sheryl L., 2016. "Drivers of Micronutrient Policy Change in Zambia: An Application of the Kaleidoscope Model," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 245110, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Manda, S. & Tallontire, A. & Dougill, A.J., 2020. "Outgrower schemes and sugar value-chains in Zambia: Rethinking determinants of rural inclusion and exclusion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Haggblade, Steven & Babu , Suresh, "undated". "A User’S Guide To The Kaleidoscope Model: Practical Tools For Understanding Policy Change," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 264396, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    9. Haggblade, Steven & Babu, Suresh & Harris, Jody & Mkwandawire, Elizabeth & Nthani, Dorothy & Hendriks, Sheryl L., "undated". "Drivers Of Micronutrient Policy Change In Zambia: An Application Of The Kaleidoscope Model," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259047, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midips:196830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.