IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma05/24287.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Helping Farmers Adjust to Policy Reforms through Demonstration Farms: Lessons from a Project in England

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey, Alison P.
  • Garforth, Chris
  • Angell, Brian
  • Scott, Tricia
  • Beedell, Jason
  • Beechener, Sam
  • Rana, Ram

Abstract

Market pressures and policy changes have heightened interest in knowledge and technology transfer in English agriculture. A government funded project, Forward Farming (2002-2004) established three separate pilots to test different ways of using demonstration to encourage change at farm level: a network of monitor farms covering the arable and livestock sectors; farms demonstrating integration between agriculture and the local community, landscape and markets; and a web-based virtual demonstration farm for the pig sector. This paper reports the results of a government-commissioned evaluation of the project. The methodology for the evaluation is described: quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect information from host farmers, a wide array of stakeholders and farmers who attended and those who did not attend Forward Farming events. Data were then compared with six case studies of monitor and demonstration programmes. The evaluation found that the monitor farms were successful in attracting farm businesses that already access sources of advice and information and in stimulating ideas for change. However, while there is a strong economic argument for public funding of demonstration, this does not necessarily require a permanent network of fixed farms. Funding to support demonstration activities from a wide range of providers, and to stimulate demand for them among farmers, will provide a more flexible option for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey, Alison P. & Garforth, Chris & Angell, Brian & Scott, Tricia & Beedell, Jason & Beechener, Sam & Rana, Ram, 2005. "Helping Farmers Adjust to Policy Reforms through Demonstration Farms: Lessons from a Project in England," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24287, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma05:24287
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24287/files/cp05ba01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Dooley, 2020. "An Ethnographic Look into Farmer Discussion Groups through the Lens of Social Learning Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Jackson, Elizabeth & Quaddus, Mohammed & Islam, Nazrul & Stanton, John, 2008. "A mixed-method approach for determining the risk and complexity farmers associate with using forward contracts," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 42305, Agricultural Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma05:24287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.