Author
Listed:
- Smith, Lisa C.
- Haddad, Lawrence James
Abstract
One out of every three children under five in developing countries is malnourished. This unacceptable state of affairs leads to a great deal of human suffering, both physical and emotional. It is a major drain on developing countries' prospects for development because malnourished children require more intense care from their parents and are less physically and intellectually productive as adults. It is also a violation of a child's human rights. While there is no question that malnutrition must come to an end, debates continue to flourish over what the most important causes of malnutrition are and what types of policies will be most successful in reducing it. The number of malnourished children in the developing world has remained fairly constant. However, while experience varies by region, the prevalence of malnutrition has been progressively declining: in 1970 the percent of underweight children under age five in developing countries was 46.5 percent; by 1995 this share had dropped to 31 percent (Figure 1). Explaining Child Malnutrition in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis, Research Report 111, by Lisa C. Smith and Lawrence Haddad, draws on the experience of 63 developing countries over this 25-year period to clarify the relative importance of the various determinants of child malnutrition for each developing region. Six factors are explored; the first four have a more direct influence on malnutrition. The four, ranked by their strength of impact, are women's education, national food availability, women's status relative to men's, and health environment quality. These are termed "underlying determinants." The other two, termed "basic determinants," are national income and democracy, which influence malnutrition indirectly by facilitating investment in the direct determinants. The report concludes by identifying policy priorities for reducing child malnutrition at the fastest pace now and over the coming years to 2020 for each developing region. The method employed is country fixed-effects regression analysis.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:iffp21:16532
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16532
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iffp21:16532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.