IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/276023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Participatory evaluation and application of portfolios of climate smart agriculture practices to enhance adaptation to climate change in mixed smallholder systems of East and Southern Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Neubauer, F.
  • Ndegwa, M.
  • De Groote, H.
  • Munyua, B.
  • Njeru, J.

Abstract

Climate change is a threat to food security in Africa. Maize is the most important staple crop in Kenya, but production per capita has decreased in recent decades. Climate smart agriculture technologies become more important, but it is important to evaluate them with farmers to learn about their needs. Therefore, we conducted participatory evaluations of five miaze varieties both on-farm and on-station. We found that farmers’ perception of varieties are complex, with yield, drought tolerance, and early maturing valued the most. Men value characteristics related to size higher than women (cob size, stalk thickness). On average, men give higher scores than women, and women score more nuanced. On-station, DH02 was liked the best, and Tego the least. On-farm, DH02 was liked the least, while Duma43 was liked the most. Further, onfarm, DH02 was liked less in the wet year than in the dry year. Farmers’ scores did not reflect yield data well, indicating their complex perceptions of varieties. Further, farmers in Makueni could increase their annual income by 51.500 KSh by adopting the improved maize varieties from this study. Maize companies could benefit from an increase in sales, with a potential demand in Makueni of 3.500 metric tons per season.

Suggested Citation

  • Neubauer, F. & Ndegwa, M. & De Groote, H. & Munyua, B. & Njeru, J., 2018. "Participatory evaluation and application of portfolios of climate smart agriculture practices to enhance adaptation to climate change in mixed smallholder systems of East and Southern Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276023, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:276023
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276023/files/2108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy; International Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:276023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.