IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Good News, Bad News: Results from a National Representative Panel Survey on China’s NCMS


  • Yi, Hongmei
  • Zhang, Linxiu
  • Singer, Kim
  • Rozelle, Scott
  • Atlas, Scott


The overall goal of the paper is to understand the progress of the implementation of China’s New Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) program. In the paper we seek to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the program and understand its effect on rural residents using a panel of national-representative, household survey data that were collected in 2005 and early 2008. According to our data, we found that there have been substantial improvements to the NCMS in coverage and participation. The service received by rural residents also improved in 2007. While the progress of the NCMS program is clear, there are still weaknesses. Most importantly, the program clearly does not meet its goal of providing insurance against catastrophic illnesses. On average, individuals that required inpatient treatment in 2007 were reimbursed for 15 percent of their expenditures. Although this is higher than in 2004, on average, as the severity of the illness (in terms of expenditures on health care) rose, the rate of coverage fell. The reimbursement rate for illnesses that required expenditures between 5,000 and 10,000 yuan (over 10,000 yuan) was only 11 percent (8 percent). Our analysis shows that the limiting factor is constrained funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Hongmei & Zhang, Linxiu & Singer, Kim & Rozelle, Scott & Atlas, Scott, 2009. "Good News, Bad News: Results from a National Representative Panel Survey on China’s NCMS," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50104, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50104

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Rural health; Insurance; China; Community/Rural/Urban Development; I1;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.