IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25671.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evolution of Income and Fiscal Disparity in Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Yi
  • Fan, Shenggen

Abstract

This paper's goal is to increase the understanding of the income and fiscal inequality trends in rural China. Using a comprehensive county-level panel dataset between 1993 and 2002, we describe the dynamic changes in national, regional and provincial inequality measures for income, fiscal spending and local revenues respectively. We examine how the coastal-inland gap, the inter-province gap, and the gap between poor and non-poor counties contribute to the growth of inequality, and devise a decomposition approach to investigate the order of inter-group inequality's contribution to the overall inequality in a multi-tier hierarchical economy. Our major finding reveals that after a turning point, 1998, most income and fiscal inequality trends started to grow together, yet at different rates. The pattern of fiscal inequality changes over time indicates that the budget constraint was not hardened after the 1994 fiscal reform. Strong evidence suggests that the inland gap between poor and non-poor counties contributed to the overall income inequality more than the coastal gap, but both decreased its contribution continuously in recent years. The order of their contributions to the overall fiscal spending inequality was reversed, implying that fiscal equalization policies, though in favor of inland areas, didn't work well in reducing the inland gap between poor and nonpoor counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Yi & Fan, Shenggen, 2006. "Evolution of Income and Fiscal Disparity in Rural China," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25671, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25671
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25671/files/cp060988.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renkow, Mitch, 2010. "Impacts of IFPRI's "priorities for pro-poor public investment" global research program:," Impact assessments 31, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.