IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hwwadp/26239.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Protektion passe?

Author

Listed:
  • Hasse, Rolf H.

Abstract

Die Frage nach dem Stand und der Entwicklung des Handelsprotektionismus wird vielfach vereinfachend beantwortet: Danach haben die GATT-Runden einen kontinuierlichen Abbau bewirkt. Diese Aussage wird überprüft. Dabei wird von vier Thesen ausgegangen: (1) Protektionismus ist ein integraler Bestandteil der internationalen Arbeitsteilung. (2) Die internationale Arbeitsteilung hat stetig zugenommen, ebenso aber auch die Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen zugunsten der nationalen Wertschöpfung. (3) Die Analyse der GATT-Runden klammert wesentliche Protektionswirkungen der Währungspolitik aus. (4) Die Ausweitung der GATTPrinzipien auf den Dienstleistungshandel (GATS) sowie den Handel mit geistigem Eigentum (TRIPS) wird einen Zuwachs an (neuem) Protektionismus hervorrufen, denn die Nachfrage nach Protektionismus ist dauerhaft und wandlungsfähig. Neben der Begründung dieser Thesen werden neue Wege zur Protektionsabwehr aufgezeigt, vor allem eine endogene Variante, die die bisherigen Formen der Entstehung einer Nachfrage nach Protektionismus auf dem politischen Markt grundsätzlich ändert. Ferner wird ein politisches Konzept vorgestellt, wie die Länder der Triade (EU, Japan, USA) ihre Handelskonflikte mindern und die WTO stärken könnten. The question of the state and the evolution of protectionism often gets a simplified answer: The main view is that the GATT Rounds have been achieving a continuous reduction. This view is partly revised based on four propositions: (1) Protectionism is an integral part of the international division of labour. (2) The international division of labour has been steadily growing, but so did the protection of the national value added, too. (3) The analyses of the GATT Rounds neglect the essential protective effects of exchange controls and exchange rate misalignments. (4) The extension of the GATT principles to the trade in services (GATS) and intellectual property rights (TRIPS) will cause and increase (new) protectionist measures, because the demand for protection is steady and flexible. Two proposals are offered to contain a rising demand for protection and to strengthen the GATT principles. First, a proposal for an endogenous barrier to this demand. Second, a concept of how the countries of the Triad (EU, Japan, USA) may reduce their trade conflicts and thereby help strengthening the GATT rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasse, Rolf H., 2002. "Protektion passe?," Discussion Paper Series 26239, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:hwwadp:26239
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/26239/files/dp020189.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.26239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasse Rolf, 2004. "Innovationen und Dienstleistungen: Dimensionen der Außenwirtschaftstheorie und -politik / Innovation and Services: Dimensions in Theory and Policy of Foreign Trade," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 224(1-2), pages 17-36, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hwwadp:26239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hwwaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.