IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi13/156224.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Individual Decisions or Institutional Dynamics? Reasons for the Intensive Use of Fertilizer in Eastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Berger, Lars
  • Hüttel, Silke
  • Hagedorn, Konrad

Abstract

The eutrophication of Lake Tai in the mid-east of China caused by an excessive import of nutrients from agricultural non-point-source pollution impedes social and economic development. In our research we aim to improve the understanding of the farmers’ decision-making process applying chemical fertilizers. Based on data gained in household interviews in 2011 and 2012 we follow the question: Which factors influence the individual decision on the use of fertilizers? Our approach is twofold: first, we estimate a production function to assess nitrogen overuse. Second, based on qualitative data we analyse the influence of the institutional context on individual decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Berger, Lars & Hüttel, Silke & Hagedorn, Konrad, 2013. "Individual Decisions or Institutional Dynamics? Reasons for the Intensive Use of Fertilizer in Eastern China," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156224, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi13:156224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/156224
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen: erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," DARE Discussion Papers 0911, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    non-point source pollution; farm-level decision-making; institutional analysis; China; Environmental Economics and Policy; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi13:156224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.