IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa166/276210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Objective sustainability assessment by Precision Livestock Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Van Hertem, Tom
  • Lague, Simon
  • Vranken, Erik

Abstract

Sustainable livestock production is needed to feed the growing, wealthier and urbanizing world population. This results in a need for better genetics and a more precise way to monitor them. The challenge and the success of intensive farming will lie in how precisely we can steer the animals towards their genetic potential. Sustainability is however often a subjective phrasing that is hard to quantify by numbers. The continuous automated monitoring of varying needs of individual living farm animals at every moment and anywhere is called Precision Livestock Farming (PLF). Sensors have the potential to replace the eyes, ears and nose of the farmer by continuously assessing different key indicators throughout the production process, 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. The aim of this research is to demonstrate the value of a Business Intelligence product that gathers farm data from automated PLF sensors to score an objective set of measures that provide evidence on sustainability. This information can then be used, not only to improve the various processes that make up good production, but output can also be used in labelling, ‘a license to produce’. The roadmap towards a sustainable on-farm meat production is described hereafter in four categories: production efficiency (also regarded as the indicator for profitability), welfare, health and emissions. Production efficiency Key Production Indicators are generated from data created by Farm Controls that use PLF-sensor technology to monitor production. Typical basic production variables are feed provided, daily growth, water use... For the automated health and welfare assessment, production data will be scored against a predetermined standard, and the current production round will be compared against historical. Emerging PLF sensor technologies use the animal as a sensor to gather evidence on the animals’ bio response to its environment and management by the farmer. Typical examples of health and welfare variables are pig coughs, activity level of the flock, distribution of the flock... The final indicator of sustainable production is emissions, or more commonly accepted the carbon score. For this, a set of production KPI’s will be translated to their equivalent carbon measures. It is important that all stakeholders understand the environmental impact per individual animal and not the production unit as a whole. PLF-technology and continuous monitoring of animal bio responses will improve the understanding of the production process. This will allow the farmer to manage his process by exception. The fact information is created by machines means the system provides an inbuilt efficiency and frequency that cannot be equalled by humans. Current assessment by inspectors takes us so far, but to have sensible dialogue will require rethink, this is where technology will play a significant role. On-farm data collection and sharing will enhance the transparency throughout the production chain and help the consumer make educated decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Hertem, Tom & Lague, Simon & Vranken, Erik, 2018. "Objective sustainability assessment by Precision Livestock Farming," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276210, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa166:276210
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276210/files/Objective%20sustainability%20assessment%20by%20Precision%20Livestock%20Farming.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa166:276210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.