IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa140/163340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Capital and Incentives in the Provision of Product Quality by Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Wendong
  • Hendrikse, George

Abstract

This article highlights the interaction between social capital, pooling and quality premiums and their influence on cooperative members’ decisions regarding their product quality. A necessary condition for cooperative equitable principles such as complete pooling is that there exists a high level of social capital in the cooperative. When the level of social capital is high, the social motivation in the cooperative can guarantee high product quality while economic incentives are weak. When the level of social capital declines, an income rights structure with stronger quality incentives must be adopted by the cooperative to maintain the product quality. The cooperative is uniquely efficient when the farmers are risk averse and product quality is uncertain. When the level of social capital in cooperatives is higher than a threshold, which is decreasing in members’ subjective risk toward production uncertainty, cooperatives are able to achieve higher product quality than IOFs.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Wendong & Hendrikse, George, 2014. "Social Capital and Incentives in the Provision of Product Quality by Cooperatives," 140th Seminar, December 13-15, 2013, Perugia, Italy 163340, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa140:163340
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/163340/files/Deng%20and%20Hendrikse-EAAE140-Full%20Paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.163340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa140:163340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.