IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa113/58009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Credibility of Collective Brand as a Source of Equity: An Empirical Application for Spanish Wine Market

Author

Listed:
  • Dopico, Domingo Calvo
  • Blazquez, F.
  • Tudoran, Alina

Abstract

The appearance of consumers groups increasingly concerned about the quality of food products, together with an increasingly competitive environment and domestic saturated markets, has led companies to achieving differentiated quality. The wine sector is immersed in this situation. Valuation of this differentiation by consumers will not happen by complying with certain standards or technical specifications, but rather it has to be perceived by consumers. Unlike experts, consumers cannot easily know which properties are intrinsic to products, which are those that give them their quality. There is, thus, a problem of uncertainty regarding the quality of products. This problem becomes more complex when consumers are faced with many alternatives of a similar perceived quality, which makes them have to decide on one without being completely sure. This problem is evident in the wine market. To solve this issue, Signalling Theory has investigated the variables used by consumers to infer quality. Among these variables are price, guarantees, origin, advertising, packaging design and brand. From the consumer point of view, the most reliable signal is the brand. Due to the territory image was earning more and more equity; an opportunity to differentiate wine emerged for these regions, which was the creation of appellations of origin. Thus, some producers of a same region or territory can collaborate and establish a joint offer which permits to differentiate a typical production. Therefore, the appellation of origin or, in our case, the collective brand, will have the basic objective of signalling differentiation. The aim of this work is therefore to ascertain the value that the collective brand, as a signal, provides for end consumers. In order to respond to this question, a field study consisting of a personal survey was carried out in 2006 on a sample of 296 Spanish purchasers and/or consumers of quality wine. Results reveal that the collective brand, as a signal, allows consumers to infer quality, but also it improves perception of the intrinsic attributes of the product, which some authors have called the halo effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Dopico, Domingo Calvo & Blazquez, F. & Tudoran, Alina, 2009. "Credibility of Collective Brand as a Source of Equity: An Empirical Application for Spanish Wine Market," 113th Seminar, September 3-6, 2009, Chania, Crete, Greece 58009, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa113:58009
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.58009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/58009/files/Dopico.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.58009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olga Untilov & Stéphane Ganassali, 2020. "Product‐harm science communication: The halo effect and its moderators," Post-Print hal-02957579, HAL.
    2. Olga Untilov & Stéphane Ganassali, 2020. "Product‐harm science communication: The halo effect and its moderators," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 1002-1027, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa113:58009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.