IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/123017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Royalty Collection For Patented Livestock

Author

Listed:
  • Lesser, William H.

Abstract

Allowing animal patents provides potential benefits and costs for livestock producers. Costs, considered here, are royalty payments and collection mechanisms, made more complex by the unknown future distribution of multiple patented traits in the herd. This article evaluates three proposed collection systems, Qualified Sales, registration and pooled royalties. The first two are imposed only on breeding stock and at first sale, creating a cash flow and risk factor for producers. The third collects payments from all animals at point of slaughter, based on traits in a sample. It favors producers at the cost of delayed payments to the patent holders. The eventual system used will depend on the cost and speed of testing for patented traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesser, William H., 1993. "Royalty Collection For Patented Livestock," Research Bulletins 123017, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:123017
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.123017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123017/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9310.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.123017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Arsdall, Roy N. & Nelson, Kenneth E., 1984. "U.S. Hog Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305428, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ted C. Schroeder & John M. Jones & David A. Nichols, 1989. "Analysis of Feeder Pig Auction Price Differentials," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 253-263.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:123017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.