IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122692.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dairy Farm Management: Business Summary New York State 1997

Author

Listed:
  • Knoblauch, Wayne A.
  • Putnam, Linda D.

Abstract

Business and financial records from 253 New York dairy farm businesses are summarized and analyzed. This analysis demonstrates the use of cash accounting and accrual adjustments to measure farm profitability, cash flow, financial performance, and costs of producing milk. Traditional methods of analyzing dairy farm businesses are combined with improved evaluation techniques to show the relationship between good management performance and financial success. The farms in the project averaged 190 cows per farm and 20,651 pounds of milk sold per cow in 1997, which are above the average size and management level of all New York dairy farms. Net farm income excluding appreciation, which is the return to the operator's labor, management, capital, and other unpaid family labor, averaged $36,928 per farm. The rate of return including appreciation to all capital invested in the farm business averaged 3.2 percent in 1997. Differences in profitability between famls continue to widen. The top 1°percent of farms average net farm income excluding appreciation was $258,543, while the lowest 1°percent was a negative $74,027. Rates of return on equity with appreciation ranged from 15 percent to negative 241 percent from the highest 10 percent to the lowest 1°percent of farms. Farms adopting bovine somatotropin (bST) experienced greater increases in milk production, had larger herds and were more profitable than farms not adopting bST. Farms adopting rotational grazing generally produced less milk per cow than non-grazing farms, but had somewhat lower costs of production and higher profitability. However, one should not conclude that adoption of these technologies alone were responsible for differences in performance. Large freestall farms averaged the highest milk output per cow and per worker, the lowest total cost of production and investment per cow, and the greatest returns to labor, management and capital. Farms milking three times a day (3X) were larger, produced more milk per cow and were more profitable than herds milking two times per day (2X). Operating cost per cwt. of milk was $0.09/cwt. higher for 3X than 2X milking herds.

Suggested Citation

  • Knoblauch, Wayne A. & Putnam, Linda D., 1998. "Dairy Farm Management: Business Summary New York State 1997," Research Bulletins 122692, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122692
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122692/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9806.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tauer, Loren W., 2003. "The Impact of recombinant bovine Somatotropin on Dairy Farm Profits: A Switching Regression Analysis," Working Papers 127241, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Tauer, Loren W., 2000. "The Impact of bST on Farm Profits," Working Papers 127677, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.