IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cuaepw/309952.html

A Scoping Review of the Development Resilience Literature: Theory, Methods and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Barrett, Christopher B.
  • Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
  • Hoddinott, John
  • Homami, Nima
  • Tennant, Elizabeth
  • Upton, Joanna
  • Wu, Tong

Abstract

Development and humanitarian agencies have rapidly embraced the concept of resilience since the 2008 global financial and food price crises. We report the results of a formal scoping review of the literature on development resilience over the ensuing period. The review identifies the theoretical and methodological underpinnings and empirical applications of resilience as the concept has been applied to individual or household well-being in low-and middle-income countries. From 9,558 search records spanning 2008-20, 301 studies met our pre-registered inclusion criteria. Among these, we identify three broad conceptualizations employed – resilience as capacity, as a normative condition, or as return to equilibrium – and explain how the resulting variation in framing leads to marked differences in empirical methods and findings. We study in greater depth a set of 45 studies that met five key criteria for empirical studies of resilience. The larger, more established, qualitative empirical literature yields insights suggestive that the concept of resilience can add value. The quantitative literature is thinner and divided among methods that limit cross-study comparability of findings. Overall, we find that development resilience remains inconsistently theorized and reliant on methods that have not been adequately reconciled to identify which tools are best suited to which questions. Despite much published evidence, most findings concentrate on just a few countries and natural shocks, and rely on cross-sectional data at just one scale of analysis. The result is a dearth of generalizable evidence, especially of rigorous impact evaluations, to guide whether or how agencies might build resilience among target populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrett, Christopher B. & Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate & Hoddinott, John & Homami, Nima & Tennant, Elizabeth & Upton, Joanna & Wu, Tong, "undated". "A Scoping Review of the Development Resilience Literature: Theory, Methods and Evidence," Applied Economics and Policy Working Paper Series 309952, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cuaepw:309952
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309952/files/WP%202021-03%20Scoping%20Review.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cuaepw:309952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.