IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cars09/187971.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should the United States eliminate unilateral sanctions prohibiting food trade?

Author

Listed:
  • Tavernier, Edmund M.

Abstract

This paper investigates sanctions from the point-of-view of the agricultural sector. Specifically the paper examines whether the US should eliminate unilateral sanctions prohibiting food trade with certain other countries. The model assumes that farm operators maximize an inter-temporal profit function. The paper concludes that taking a broad view of agricultural policy issues may be challenging if the perceived benefits seem distant. Nevertheless taken in their entirety the results suggest that agricultural producers in New Jersey perceive positive benefits from removal of sanctions prohibiting food trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Tavernier, Edmund M., 2010. "Should the United States eliminate unilateral sanctions prohibiting food trade?," 28th West Indies Agricultural Economic Conference/2009 Barbados National Agricultural Conference, July 2009, Barbados 187971, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:cars09:187971
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.187971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/187971/files/Should%20the%20United%20States%20eliminate%20unilateral%20sanctions%20prohibiting%20food%20trade.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.187971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cars09:187971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caestea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.