IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/asae17/284867.html

Trade Creation, Political Sensitivity and Product Exclusions: the Political Economy of Agriculture Protection in China’s FTAs

Author

Listed:
  • Lyu, Jianxing
  • Prehn, Soren
  • Zhang, Yanjie
  • Glauben, Thomas
  • Zeng, Yinchu

Abstract

One of the most significant features in Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is that certain products are excluded from tariff concession. Why do some products get more protection in FTAs?In this paper, using the highly disaggregated product-level data in agricultural sector of China’s FTAs, we examined and extended the hypothesis developed by Grossman and Helpman (1995), illustrating the products which are more likely to be excluded in FTAs. Our results suggest that, with the involvement of political costs to incumbent government, products which experience trade creation and have more political sensitivity are more likely to be excluded in FTAs. Moreover, we revealed that the Chinese government tend to achieve different goals through negotiation power, seeking more economic benefits from big-trading partners while giving more concession to small-trading partners.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyu, Jianxing & Prehn, Soren & Zhang, Yanjie & Glauben, Thomas & Zeng, Yinchu, 2017. "Trade Creation, Political Sensitivity and Product Exclusions: the Political Economy of Agriculture Protection in China’s FTAs," 2017 ASAE 9th International Conference, January 11-13, Bangkok, Thailand 284867, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asae17:284867
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284867/files/Jianxing%20Lyu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lukasz Chmielewski & Piotr Szajner, 2025. "The Impact of Trade Liberalization between the European Union and Mercosur on the EU Sugar Sector," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 44-62.
    3. Bangchu Qiu & Gang Tian & Daoming Wang, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of Sustainable Trade Effects of FTAs Based on Augmented Gravity Model: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asae17:284867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.