Author
Listed:
- Angala, A.
- van Rooyen, J.
Abstract
This article discusses the competitive performance of the Namibian date industry from 2001 to 2013 in a highly competitive global environment. Competitiveness is viewed as the ability of an industry to sustain trade against the competition in the global market. The economic sustainability of the Namibian date fruit industry is found to be dependent on its trading performance with more than 90% of the production being exported. In this study, the conventional �agribusiness competitive analysis� framework (refer to Ismea, 1999; Esterhuizen, 2006; Van Rooyen et al., 2011, 2012; Jafta, 2014 and Boonzaaier, 2015) is expanded to: measure and consider the validity of the questions posed to industry executives; to contain information on the current impacts vs. long-term relevance of the various factors influencing the competitive performance; as well as to consider consensus vs. variations in opinions and similarities and differences within the date industry value chain. The relative trade advantage (RTA) method, extended by Volrath (1991) from the original Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) model (Balassa, 1965; 1989), was firstly used to empirically measure competitive performance. The opinions of the Namibian date executives through the Date Executive Surveys (DES, 2015) are then used to identify and discuss the competitiveness trends and to qualitatively analyse factors influencing the competitive performance of this industry. The Porter Diamond is applied to derive the industry determinants of competitive performance. The factors identified were grouped into the six Porter diamond determinants, statistically analysed and discussed to account for value chain differences and consensus vs conflict views. Based on the analysis, industry-level strategic actions are proposed to enhance competitive performance. Key Words: Competitive Performance, Namibian Date Industry, Five-Step Analytical Framework, Relative Trade Advantage (RTA) and Porter Diamond
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.