IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare03/57870.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost Sharing In Animal Disease Management: A Case Study Of Footrot In Sheep Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ghose, Ananda
  • Ekersley, Peter
  • Cook, David C.

Abstract

This paper recommends a cost sharing approach for footrot management in Western Australia (WA). Appropriate public and private contributions are determined through an assessment of the benefits produced by the Department of Agriculture’s footrot management program. With rising costs a decreasing departmental budget over time, moves towards a beneficiary pays approach to footrot management have been long anticipated. Although the principles underpinning the framework for national animal disease management (put forward by the Centre of International Economics in 1998) have been agreed to by WA industry stakeholders, this paper provides an alternative approach for cost sharing based on the principles of beneficiary analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghose, Ananda & Ekersley, Peter & Cook, David C., 2003. "Cost Sharing In Animal Disease Management: A Case Study Of Footrot In Sheep Industry," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57870, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare03:57870
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.57870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/57870/files/2003_ghose.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.57870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare03:57870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.